Okay, I've tried both this and Shu's version, and I have to say I overwhelmingly prefer this curler. IMHO, Shu's is for bigger more deep set eyes, and seeing as I don't have big deep set eyes, the cu...

Okay, I've tried both this and Shu's version, and I have to say I overwhelmingly prefer this curler. IMHO, Shu's is for bigger more deep set eyes, and seeing as I don't have big deep set eyes, the cu...

I like these better than the Clean and Clear ones because they're bigger and cover a larger area of my face. Plus, the powder doesn't irritate my skin - it helps to make it more matte. The only down...

I balked when the MA at Neiman's suggested this blush for me, because it looks so bright in the package. But don't be scared. It's actually a very natural and playful pink. Just a a little bit adds...

I got this in Brilliance and Gleam. They're really pretty and sheer, and the packaging is oh so cute. But they have no staying power and at $24 each, they're totally not worth purchasing again.

I have oily skin and this made it uncomfortably tight and dry. It also didn't lather well. At $33, it's just not worth buying.

I bought this expecting it would diminish some of the fine lines under my eyes. But after using it for over a month, I don't see any improvement. It moisturizes well and provides a velvety base for ...

This is very pretty, but only if you like a lot of intense irridescent sparkle on your lips. It also has good staying power and a nice texture - not goopy like so many other glosses. The only downsi...

This is a good summertime blush - a very shimmery, peachy-pink shade. However, I've gotten more pale, and now it doesn't show up on me very well. I think it's better suited for tanned skin, a la J.L...

I jumped on the bandwagon and got these in Cannes, a bronzey rose, and Malibu, a mauvey pink. But IMHO, they didn't live up to the hype. They're too drying for the lips, and I found the cream-to-pow...