A disappointment. Nondescript, boring. You don't really perceive it as a fragrance. The worst of the Chanel fragrances. Real hype. Expensive - and utterly dull.

A perfume like a beautiful painting by Renoir. A work of art. Unfortunately, it does fade away very quickly and is only available as Eau de Toilette... but nevertheless, it has very rare poetic qualit...

I agree with Kama79 who also detected the smell of good old Trésor in the new "Magnifique" - although I think it is a fresher, up-to-date version... but not really surprising. Thought they might come ...

Amazone, came out in 1974 - fresh start with some classic flowers, fruity undertones and a dery dry, really dry drydown with masses of cedre and santal (now what is cedre in English??) Zeder in Deutsc...

A voluptous fragrance, with leather tones, amber and woody notes. Some spices were added, some flowers for elegance's sake, some friut to make it even more seducing. I can see Venice, when I smell it,...

Simply one of the very best eaux de Colognes money can buy. If you adore this special citrussy smell - that's the one 4 U. Don't look any further.

No real iris, a morbid scent, could be worn at a funeral. Too expensive - given the poor quality.

I adore this scent. How annoying that Turin&Sanchez ( in their recent perfume guide) call it "medicated treacle"... according to them, you should never wear it to dinner...well, I don't care about thi...

Sadly discontinued. Extremely wonderful smell - a fantastic flacon by Lalique. Unobtrusive, but elegant and romantic. A perfume from my youth which will never come back.

Nothing special. Very matte colours, good for every day use, but rather expensive. Revlon is better value, so is MAC and L'Oreal.